In a pivotal transparency test case, the UPC Court of Appeal has recently delivered a nuanced interpretation of the law, narrowly shaping the parameters of legal intervention. Notably, the court dismissed interventions from two law firms, citing stringent adherence to "legal interest" rules. This ruling establishes a formidable threshold for external involvement in UPC cases, signaling a discernible shift in the landscape of legal proceedings. As the legal community grapples with these developments, concerns regarding transparency linger, amplifying anticipation for the definitive decision slated to be unveiled in the spring of 2024.
Thanks as ever to leading IP publication World IP Review for inviting us to join the debate. See the full piece, including comments from partner, Mike Gilbert, below.